Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Global Government Affairs
@GlobalAffairs
·
6d
The statement criticizes French authorities for their investigation into a tech company, suggesting that the actions are politically motivated and detrimental to the French public. The tone is accusatory and implies that bureaucratic self-interest is undermining tech investment in France.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to a negative perception of French authorities, potentially undermining trust in public institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but does question the integrity of French bureaucrats, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead making broad accusations without evidence, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem attack against French bureaucrats. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to criticize French authorities, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion against them, but it does not offer constructive solutions or dialogue. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity, as it makes serious accusations without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.