Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
53d
@AndrewLampinen Andrew, fascinating thread. Two questions,

1. Who has actually argued “Even now, (neuro)symbolic advocates often argue that pure symbol manipulation is the only "real" intelligence, and "messy" deep learning should just be an input to symbol manipulation”? I consider myself to
7/22/2025, 1:05:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Thenameless one
@Descartesmind
·
52d
@AndrewLampinen @GaryMarcus What do you think?
Andrew Lampinen
@AndrewLampinen
·
53d
Quick thread on the recent IMO results and the relationship between symbol manipulation, reasoning, and intelligence in machines and humans:

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the role of symbol manipulation, reasoning, and intelligence in AI, sparked by the performance of an AI model at the International Mathematical Olympiad. It engages with public issues related to AI development and its implications for understanding intelligence, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on discussing AI advancements. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding of AI's role in reasoning and intelligence, fostering a deeper comprehension of the field. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation is constructive, engaging in dialogue about differing views on AI without personal attacks. [+2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing AI advancements and their implications. [+1]