Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the rapid development of AGI, labeling it as 'foolish, reckless, and frankly evil.' It reflects a strong opinion on a significant public issue, namely the ethical considerations and potential risks associated with artificial general intelligence.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses harsh language without providing constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses strong negative language without engaging in a balanced discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.