Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 103
7/24/2025, 5:20:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Garry Kasparov
@Kasparov63
·
41d
Is there something like Parkinson’s Law for AI work and productivity? E.g., The more AI brought into the workflow, the more human hours are required to check it? @GaryMarcus
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
@LuizaJarovsky
·
42d
I haven't found a single peer-reviewed paper covering AI-powered productivity increase that also takes into consideration the additional work required to review, correct, and oversee AI outputs.

The "increased productivity" and "socially beneficial" claims have been at the core

The statement is part of a conversation about AI productivity and its implications, which is a public issue. The tone is inquisitive and slightly humorous, suggesting a potential solution to a problem discussed in the thread.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a different perspective on AI productivity issues, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question with a suggestion, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public discussion on AI and productivity. [+1]