Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47

Score 71

Reposted by Gary Marcus

Is there something like Parkinson’s Law for AI work and productivity? E.g., The more AI brought into the workflow, the more human hours are required to check it? @GaryMarcus

Luiza Jarovsky, PhD

@LuizaJarovsky

41d

I haven't found a single peer-reviewed paper covering AI-powered productivity increase that also takes into consideration the additional work required to review, correct, and oversee AI outputs.

The "increased productivity" and "socially beneficial" claims have been at the core

7/24/2025, 2:17:19 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the impact of AI on productivity and the potential need for increased human oversight, which are relevant societal issues. It invites discussion on the efficiency and implications of AI in the workplace.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm and raises a legitimate question about AI's impact on productivity, aligning with the principle. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By questioning AI's role in productivity, the statement encourages understanding and further exploration of the topic, aligning with the principle. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement invites constructive dialogue by posing a question rather than making personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss a relevant issue, aligning with the principle. [+1]