Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a public issue related to the use of AI tools like ChatGPT in legal contexts, highlighting the lack of legal privilege and the potential risks of using such tools for legal advice. It serves as a cautionary note to users about the implications of their actions when interacting with AI.
- The statement does no harm and provides a warning to users about the potential legal implications of using ChatGPT for legal advice, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By informing users about the lack of legal privilege, the statement promotes understanding and awareness of the limitations of AI tools in legal contexts. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses its influence to better inform society about the responsible use of AI, contributing positively to public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly informing the public about the limitations of AI tools in legal contexts, using the platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.