Peter Wildeford (hiring!) 🇺🇸🚀
@peterwildeford
·
28d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about AI development and the need for alternatives to large language models (LLMs). The tone is cautionary, emphasizing the potential risks of AI systems that are not fully understood by their creators. The intent is to advocate for proactive measures in AI policy and development.
- The statement aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for alternatives to potentially dangerous AI systems. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need for careful consideration of AI's impact. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by discussing the need for policy solutions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.