Ana Paula Henkel
@AnaPaulaVolei
·
42d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
41d
The statement highlights a concern about judicial control over freedom of speech and access to information, particularly in the context of a journalist seeking to interview a controversial figure. It implies a critique of the judicial process and its impact on journalistic freedom.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about potential harm to journalistic freedom.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but questions the dignity of the judicial process, implying criticism without personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Engages in constructive criticism of the judicial system, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Uses influence to highlight issues of freedom of speech and press, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.