0
Ana Paula Henkel
@AnaPaulaVolei
·
41d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
41d
The statement involves a discussion about a journalist's request to interview a former advisor to ex-president Bolsonaro, who claims to have been unjustly imprisoned and tortured. It touches on issues of press freedom, judicial conduct, and international relations, particularly between Brazil and the U.S. The inclusion of an image showing a controversial gesture by a Brazilian judge adds a layer of critique regarding judicial behavior.
- The statement raises concerns about potential injustice and aims to investigate claims of mistreatment, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The critique of the judge's behavior could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The intent to investigate claims of injustice promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques judicial behavior, which could be seen as constructive criticism, but the tone may border on personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.