Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement and accompanying image discuss a request for an interview with Filipe Martins, referencing a precedent set by the Brazilian Supreme Court allowing interviews with President Lula while he was imprisoned. The argument is framed around the principles of freedom of expression and the press, suggesting that denying the interview would violate these rights. The tone is formal and legalistic, aiming to persuade by citing legal precedents and constitutional rights.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal rights and precedents rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the legal context and the importance of freedom of expression. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for journalistic freedom and transparency, aiming to benefit society by upholding democratic principles. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech principles by arguing against censorship and for the right to information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.