Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation revolve around the process of labeling individuals based on social media activity, highlighting issues of accuracy and speed in the context of legal and political scrutiny. The tone suggests a critical view of the procedural errors and the pressure to act quickly, which may impact the fairness and accuracy of the process.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement highlights procedural errors, suggesting potential harm due to mislabeling individuals, which could violate the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The discussion involves privacy concerns, as individuals are flagged based on social media activity, potentially violating their privacy and dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on procedural issues and errors.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of the process, pointing out flaws and the need for accuracy over speed. [+1]