Michael Schellenberger

The statement criticizes the Supreme Court's handling of the January 8 riots in Brazil, suggesting errors and misidentifications in the judicial process. It implies a lack of due process and fairness, potentially undermining public trust in the judiciary.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by undermining trust in the judicial system, though it raises concerns about due process. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by not disclosing personal details but criticizes the handling of cases, which could be seen as disrespectful to the institution. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the judicial process, which could be constructive if aimed at improving transparency and accountability. [+1]