Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying messages discuss the handling of reports related to the release of women by the Supreme Court, indicating a procedural and possibly political context. The tone suggests urgency and a need for efficiency in processing legal documents. The mention of a representative dictating actions without official authority raises concerns about procedural integrity.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and messages do not directly cause harm but imply a rushed process that could lead to errors, potentially harming individuals involved. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   There is a potential violation of privacy and dignity, as the process seems to involve labeling individuals without clear justification. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The communication lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on speed over accuracy and fairness. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The dialogue does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead showing a top-down directive approach. [-1]