Michael Schellenberger

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -28
8/4/2025, 4:05:13 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“Does the team have the women’s positive reports handy so I can print and show them to the Justice?”

The group’s messages make it clear that Moraes dictated their activities. On March 8, 2023, the STF made headlines by announcing the release of 149 women on International Women’s
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“We can’t afford to sit around philosophizing.”

Sources close to the investigation revealed that Moraes' representative, Kusahara, “basically told the judges what to do,” despite holding no official position in the court.

Kusahara left no doubt that the purpose of the operation
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
A “shameful stain on the Supreme Court”

Ademir Domingos Pinto da Silva, a 54-year-old street vendor from southern Brazil, wasn’t even present at the January 8 riots. He arrived later that night at the military camp in Brasília to sell flags and T-shirts. Police blocked him from
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“I can go into full detail, but it won’t meet the speed you all need.”

Errors were common. A woman named Vildete was mistakenly flagged as “positive.” Minutes later, the team realized they had confused her with someone else and changed her label to “negative.”

Moraes’ demand
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“Enforcing the Constitution is not a coup.”

Adenilson Demetrio de Cordova received a “positive” label because of a single post found on X. It linked to a petition titled “Manifesto to the Brazilian Nation – In Defense of Liberty,” published months before the 2022 election by a
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“So, according to Egghead, nobody can question anything?”

In one case, the task force flagged a truck driver, Claudiomiro da Rosa Soares, for a series of Facebook posts that criticized Lula and questioned the 2022 election. Accused of “violent attempt against the democratic

The statement and accompanying images discuss internal communications related to investigations and legal proceedings, touching on issues of privacy, legal processes, and potential overreach by authorities. The tone is procedural and focused on compliance with instructions from a higher authority.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement shows an effort to comply with legal instructions, but there is a potential risk of harm if privacy is not respected. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    There is a concern about privacy and dignity, as the discussion involves monitoring private communications and labeling individuals, which could lead to misidentification or unjust treatment. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The communication is focused on following orders and does not engage in personal attacks, but the lack of transparency and potential for errors could undermine constructive dialogue.