Michael Schellenberger

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -28
8/4/2025, 4:06:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“Can I reach out to partners?”

Later on March 3, Kusahara wrote, “I’m going to pass on an instruction from the Justice: Ask Eduardo to check whether they’ve participated in any WhatsApp or Telegram groups about the coup.”

In an effort to comply, Tagliaferro asked if he could
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“Does the team have the women’s positive reports handy so I can print and show them to the Justice?”

The group’s messages make it clear that Moraes dictated their activities. On March 8, 2023, the STF made headlines by announcing the release of 149 women on International Women’s
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“We can’t afford to sit around philosophizing.”

Sources close to the investigation revealed that Moraes' representative, Kusahara, “basically told the judges what to do,” despite holding no official position in the court.

Kusahara left no doubt that the purpose of the operation
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
A “shameful stain on the Supreme Court”

Ademir Domingos Pinto da Silva, a 54-year-old street vendor from southern Brazil, wasn’t even present at the January 8 riots. He arrived later that night at the military camp in Brasília to sell flags and T-shirts. Police blocked him from
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“I can go into full detail, but it won’t meet the speed you all need.”

Errors were common. A woman named Vildete was mistakenly flagged as “positive.” Minutes later, the team realized they had confused her with someone else and changed her label to “negative.”

Moraes’ demand
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
29d
“Enforcing the Constitution is not a coup.”

Adenilson Demetrio de Cordova received a “positive” label because of a single post found on X. It linked to a petition titled “Manifesto to the Brazilian Nation – In Defense of Liberty,” published months before the 2022 election by a

The statement criticizes the actions of the STF and TSE, suggesting they overstepped legal boundaries, and includes a quote from a former Supreme Court Justice. It implies a misuse of power and questions the proportionality of sentences related to January 8 events. The tone is critical and challenges the legitimacy of judicial actions, suggesting authoritarian tendencies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by undermining trust in judicial institutions, potentially inciting public distrust. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as disrespecting the dignity of those involved by labeling actions as 'nefarious.' [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on personal attacks rather than solutions. [-1]