In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
28d
The statement discusses significant political and legal issues in Brazil, including actions by the Supreme Court and international trade relations. It implies criticism of the Brazilian judiciary's actions and suggests political motivations behind legal decisions. The tone is critical and suggests a narrative of governmental overreach and international consequences.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading unverified claims about the judiciary's actions.聽[-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of the judiciary, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated.聽[-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism.聽[-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims.聽[-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.