In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
28d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
28d
The statement discusses the use of social media posts by the Brazilian Supreme Court to detain pro-Bolsonaro protesters, raising concerns about legality and judicial processes. It implies potential misuse of power and highlights political tensions in Brazil.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by judicial actions, suggesting a violation of legal norms. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the respect for privacy and dignity by implying that social media posts were used improperly. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of judicial actions and their implications, though it may also incite division. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of the judicial process, which can be constructive if aimed at reform and accountability. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.