Michael Schellenberger

The statement discusses the classification of individuals by a task force related to events on January 8, highlighting potential errors and issues in the process. It critiques the actions of the Supreme Court and the task force, suggesting a lack of fairness and accuracy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by suggesting wrongful classification, which could harm individuals' reputations. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It raises concerns about privacy and dignity, as individuals are publicly labeled based on potentially erroneous information. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding of the situation by highlighting errors, but it may lack empathy towards those involved in the task force.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the task force and the Supreme Court, but it could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue by focusing on errors without suggesting solutions. [-1]