Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying images discuss the urgency and pressure within a judicial task force, highlighting issues of misidentification and procedural errors. It critiques the authoritative management style and the demand for rapid results, which may compromise accuracy and fairness.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests potential harm due to rushed decisions and errors in judicial processes, which could negatively impact individuals involved. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   There is a concern for privacy and dignity, as individuals are misidentified and potentially wrongfully classified, which could lead to reputational harm. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on speed over careful consideration of individual cases. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The critique of the task force's management style is constructive, highlighting the need for balance between speed and accuracy. [+1]