Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying images suggest a discussion about monitoring and verifying participation in certain groups, possibly related to political activities. The tone appears to be procedural and focused on compliance with instructions from a higher authority. The content touches on issues of privacy, surveillance, and the role of authority in judicial processes.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may violate the principle of doing no harm if it involves unjust surveillance or targeting of individuals based on their group participation. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   There is a potential violation of respecting privacy and dignity, as the discussion involves monitoring private communications. [-2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it appears to follow directives without questioning their implications. [-1]