Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
20d
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing allegations of judicial misconduct in Brazil, specifically regarding the January 8 events. The tone is urgent and accusatory, calling for amnesty, annulment of legal processes, and accountability for those responsible. It suggests a significant misuse of power by Brazil's Supreme Court, framing it as a political maneuver to maintain control.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading unverified claims, which could incite unrest or distrust in judicial institutions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by making serious allegations without clear evidence, potentially leading to harassment or defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not provide a platform for discussion or rebuttal. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.