Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement discusses alleged actions by public figures related to political analysis and arrests, suggesting misuse of power. It implies a critique of political and judicial processes, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by making serious allegations without evidence, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It mentions individuals by name, potentially violating their privacy and dignity, and could be seen as a form of harassment if the claims are unfounded. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack, lacking evidence or a call for dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.