Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying image discuss allegations against the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding the use of social media posts to incarcerate protesters. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses legal and political issues in Brazil.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises serious allegations that could harm reputations if unsubstantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It involves sensitive legal and political issues, requiring respect for privacy and dignity, which may be compromised if the claims are not verified. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement could promote understanding if it encourages investigation and transparency, but it may also incite division if perceived as biased.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement could be seen as engaging in constructive criticism if it leads to dialogue about judicial practices, but it risks being perceived as a personal attack on the judiciary.