Michael Schellenberger

The statement and images involve a discussion about political and judicial actions in Brazil, specifically concerning allegations against a public figure, Alexandre de Moraes. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of governance, legal actions, and democratic principles.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential misuse of judicial power, which could harm individuals if true. However, it does not provide evidence within the statement itself, which could lead to misinformation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal information but could be seen as accusatory without substantiated evidence, potentially affecting the dignity of those involved. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding of alleged judicial overreach, but the lack of evidence and context may hinder empathy and compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of judicial actions, but without clear evidence, it risks being perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]