In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
The statement and accompanying images discuss allegations against a Supreme Court justice in Brazil, suggesting misuse of power and legal overreach. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of judicial conduct and democratic principles.
- The statement raises serious allegations which, if true, could indicate harm. However, it does not directly cause harm itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal information but could be seen as accusatory, potentially affecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of alleged judicial misconduct, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement presents criticism of judicial actions, which is constructive if based on evidence, but could be seen as personal if not.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight potential issues in the judiciary, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.