Michael Schellenberger

The statement criticizes the concentration of judicial power in the hands of a single judge, suggesting a lack of checks and balances. It implies a violation of legal principles and judicial fairness.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by the concentration of power, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory, potentially bordering on disrespect. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement seeks to promote understanding of judicial issues, aligning with this principle. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism of judicial practices, which can be constructive if aimed at reform. [+1]