Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing legal principles related to judicial impartiality and due process. It references constitutional and international legal standards, suggesting a critique of judicial practices. The tone is analytical, focusing on legal frameworks to address concerns about the concentration of judicial power.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal principles rather than personal attacks. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding by referencing specific legal articles and frameworks, fostering informed discussion. [+2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing potential issues in the judicial system without resorting to ad hominem arguments. [+2]