Michael Schellenberger

The statement discusses censorship and restriction of freedom of expression, suggesting that political opinions and criticisms are being criminalized as 'anti-democratic.' This is a critique of judicial actions, implying a violation of free speech rights.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of judicial actions, potentially engaging in criticism rather than harassment.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of judicial actions, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses influence to address societal issues, aiming to protect freedom of expression. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by advocating against censorship. [+1]