Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing legal principles related to freedom of expression and judicial processes. It references constitutional and international legal articles to argue against perceived censorship and concentration of judicial power. The tone is critical and aims to highlight potential violations of legal rights.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for legal rights and freedoms. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on legal principles rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of judicial practices, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by promoting legal rights. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing legal rights and potential violations. [+1]