In reply to:
Organizermemes
@OrganizerMemes
·
81d
jp
@excesstential
·
81d
The statement questions the ethical stance of another user, implying skepticism about their claim of ethical behavior. It engages in a public discussion about transparency and ethics in online activities, particularly related to political work.
- The statement challenges the ethical stance of another user, which could be seen as a form of criticism. However, it does not provide evidence or constructive feedback, potentially leading to misunderstanding or harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy or dignity of the person it addresses, as it questions their ethics without substantial evidence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide evidence to support its claim, instead making a personal attack on the user's ethical standards. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.