In reply to:
Diablo Neruda
@DiabloNeruda
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
@TulsiGabbard
·
3d
The statement is a defensive response to an accusation made in a public conversation involving political figures. It addresses issues of integrity, honesty, and the motivations behind political campaigns, which are public concerns. The tone is defensive and accusatory, suggesting a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes an accusatory question implying dishonesty. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it suggests that the person being addressed is a 'paid liar,' which could be considered a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the substance of the original claim. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.