Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing issues of censorship, media freedom, and international relations. It critiques perceived government overreach and censorship in Europe, particularly in relation to social media and political figures.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses charged language ('threats', 'desperate') which may not promote a balanced discussion, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does imply negative intentions of others without substantial evidence.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a confrontational tone, which may hinder productive dialogue. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of perceived issues, but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment.