Michael Schellenberger

The statement questions the actions of a political leader, suggesting censorship and prosecution of opponents, and is part of a broader discussion on political dynamics in Europe. It implies criticism of government actions and raises concerns about democratic principles.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by accusing a leader of censoring and prosecuting enemies, which could be seen as harmful if unsubstantiated. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the privacy and dignity of the political figure by making serious accusations without evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a confrontational tone without providing evidence or context. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about political issues, but does so in a potentially inflammatory manner.