Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
9/1/2025, 7:01:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Holly ⏸️ Elmore
@ilex_ulmus
·
13d
Even tho I do think he gives people license to ignore the problem, if you don’t want what @GaryMarcus is saying to be true then you and I have a deeper division. I want to be saved from dangerously powerful AI, at least until another paradigm is developed, one way or another.
Holly ⏸️ Elmore
@ilex_ulmus
·
13d
I’m suspicious that a lot of x-risk people hate @GaryMarcus bc they want AI to be powerful instead of bc they are concerned about people underestimating the threat.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI and its potential risks. The conversation involves a discussion about the influence of public figures on the perception of AI risks and the potential for misinterpretation of their words. The tone of the statement suggests a defensive stance, indicating a concern about being misrepresented.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does not actively strive to prevent harm either. It is neutral in this regard.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on clarifying the speaker's position rather than fostering dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It addresses the issue of misinterpretation without attacking individuals. [+1]