Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
14d
The statement critiques the behavior of certain individuals within the existential risk community, suggesting that their actions are detrimental to the cause they aim to support. The tone is critical and implies that exaggeration or misinformation about AI risks could lead to a lack of credibility and public trust in future warnings.
- The statement implies that certain actions are causing harm to the cause of existential risk awareness, which suggests a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to engage in constructive dialogue or offer a path for resolution, which could be seen as a missed opportunity for constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.