Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
190d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
366d
The statement expresses concern over perceived threats to free speech and government overreach, using strong language to describe the UK as a 'police state.' It suggests a narrative of increasing authoritarianism in Europe, particularly in relation to digital IDs and policing of speech.
- The statement uses charged language that could incite fear or panic, potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of those it criticizes, using terms like 'police state' without substantiation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering a divisive narrative. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, labeling leaders as 'WEF puppets' without constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.