-7
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
190d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
366d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital IDs and government surveillance, raising concerns about privacy and civil liberties. The tone is alarmist, suggesting a potential erosion of freedoms and likening the situation to a 'police state.'
- The statement may cause harm by inciting fear and panic about government actions without providing balanced information. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not targeting individuals but could be seen as engaging in fearmongering. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on a negative portrayal of government actions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using strong language and comparisons to a 'police state' without offering solutions or alternatives. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.