Michael Schellenberger

The statement questions the simultaneous pursuit of digital IDs by governments, implying a coordinated effort. It suggests skepticism about the motives behind digital ID implementation, hinting at potential negative implications for privacy and freedom.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm from digital IDs, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by questioning government actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by highlighting potential privacy issues with digital IDs, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by encouraging scrutiny of government actions, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policies, aligning with engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]