Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital IDs and government surveillance, raising concerns about privacy and civil liberties.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm from government policies, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It questions government actions, potentially respecting privacy and dignity by highlighting surveillance issues. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of digital ID implications, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The tone is critical and somewhat alarmist, which may hinder constructive dialogue, slightly violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]