Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying emails discuss the strategic timing of legal actions and public statements by NGOs against Twitter, in relation to hate speech regulation and public policy. This involves public discourse as it addresses issues of free speech, regulation, and corporate responsibility.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but discusses strategic legal and public relations actions, which could indirectly impact public perception and policy.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The emails respect privacy by redacting personal information, but the strategic nature of the discussion could be seen as manipulative, potentially affecting dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards the NGOs' concerns, focusing instead on strategic advantages. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in strategic dialogue rather than constructive criticism, focusing on public relations rather than addressing the core issues raised by the NGOs. [-1]