In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
The statement discusses the historical context of censorship in France, linking it to current legal and policy debates involving Twitter and NGOs. It critiques the French approach to censorship and implies a continuity of restrictive practices. The tone is critical and analytical, aiming to provide historical context to ongoing legal actions and policy discussions.
- The statement provides historical context without direct harm, but the critical tone could be seen as challenging to French policies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on historical and policy analysis rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing historical context, though it may lack empathy towards the French perspective. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of French censorship practices, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.