Michael Schellenberger

The statement discusses the impact of legislative actions on online freedom of expression in France, referencing significant political events. It critiques the French government's approach to censorship and regulation, suggesting a historical pattern of state repression.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by suggesting state repression of free expression, which could be seen as a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It raises awareness about potential overreach in censorship, promoting understanding of the issue. [+1]
3. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to critique government actions, potentially for societal betterment by advocating for free expression. [+1]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   It upholds free speech by discussing the implications of legislative actions on expression. [+1]