In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
The statement and accompanying images discuss a legal and public relations strategy involving Twitter and NGOs regarding hate speech regulations in France. The content reveals internal deliberations about compliance, confidentiality, and potential media leaks, highlighting tensions between corporate interests and public accountability.
- The statement shows an attempt to navigate legal obligations and public perception, but the focus on confidentiality and potential media leaks suggests a prioritization of corporate interests over transparency, which may indirectly cause harm by undermining public trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussion of confidentiality and potential leaks indicates a concern for privacy, but the willingness to disclose information under certain conditions may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of all parties involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a focus on promoting understanding or empathy, as it primarily addresses strategic considerations rather than fostering constructive dialogue with the NGOs. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The internal communications reflect a strategic approach to criticism and disagreement, but the emphasis on PR risks and media narratives suggests a defensive posture rather than open, constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.