In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
146d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
148d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
146d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
146d
The statement and accompanying images discuss allegations of censorship involving the French government, Twitter, and the European Parliament. It raises concerns about free speech and government influence over social media platforms, suggesting a strategic lawsuit to test Twitter's response times during the COVID-19 pandemic. The tone is critical and investigative, aiming to expose perceived censorship practices.
- The statement aims to expose potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by focusing on public figures and institutions rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and awareness of censorship issues, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of public policies and actions, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting potential censorship, the statement uses its platform to advocate for free speech, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.