Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying images discuss the European Parliament's blocking of a website, suggesting it is part of a broader censorship effort. The tone is critical, implying that the action is unjustified and politically motivated.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests harm by implying censorship is being used to suppress information, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It questions the privacy and dignity of those involved by suggesting they are part of a censorship scheme, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging potential security concerns. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]