In reply to:
Amélie Ismaïli
@ame_ism
·
148d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
148d
The statement and conversation involve a discussion about censorship, legal actions, and the role of social media platforms in public discourse, particularly in the context of French politics and societal issues. It touches on the implications of content moderation and the relationship between government actions and social media companies.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by censorship and the role of social media in public discourse, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussion respects privacy by not revealing personal information, but it involves sensitive topics related to public figures and events.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The conversation promotes understanding by discussing the complexities of content moderation and legal actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue engages in constructive criticism of government actions and social media policies, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.