Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about democracy and free speech in Europe, particularly in France and Germany. It suggests that the inability to vote for preferred candidates or speak freely without fear of arrest undermines democratic principles. The tone is urgent and critical, aiming to highlight perceived threats to democracy and free speech.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for democratic principles, but the alarmist tone may contribute to fear or misunderstanding.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in hyperbolic rhetoric, which might not fully respect the dignity of the countries or leaders mentioned. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of democratic values but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not foster empathy or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of European governments, but the tone is accusatory rather than constructive, potentially leading to polarization. [-1]