The statement and associated content engage in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship, free speech, and transparency within the European Parliament. The tone is critical and seeks accountability from public officials regarding the blocking of a news website. The statement raises concerns about potential censorship and lack of transparency, which are significant public issues.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of public officials by questioning their actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding and empathy by seeking transparency and accountability, encouraging public dialogue on censorship.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of public officials without resorting to personal attacks.
[+1]