Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -105
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
145d

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship, democracy, and international relations, specifically concerning NATO and European political actions. It suggests that actions by European leaders threaten democratic principles and the existence of NATO.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about democracy and censorship, aiming to highlight potential harms to democratic processes. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It critiques public figures and governments, which could be seen as a challenge to their actions rather than a violation of privacy or dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding of perceived threats to democracy, though it may lack empathy towards the accused parties.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of European leaders, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue, but it risks being perceived as accusatory. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on international relations and democratic principles. [+1]