In reply to:
papegai
@cie_papegai
·
145d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
145d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
147d
The statement 'bonkers' is a dismissive response to a discussion about free speech and censorship, particularly in the context of state control and regulation. The conversation involves critiques of government actions related to free speech and the regulation of NGOs, suggesting a tension between safety and freedom. The tone is informal and critical, likely intended to undermine the previous points made about state-approved free speech.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the complexity of the issue without engaging constructively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it lacks respect for the nuanced discussion of free speech and censorship.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a dismissive tone, which does not foster understanding or resolution. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.